Name: 10-Layer HDI Rigid-flex PCB
Material: NPG-170N+PI
Layers: 10L(1+1+6+1+1)
Thickness: 1.0mm
Surface Finish: ENIG
Min Trace/Width: 2.5/2.5mil
Application: Smart Wear
In the realm of high-speed electronic design, controlled impedance is an absolute requirement for flex and rigid-flex printed circuit board (PCB) configurations. This blog post delves into the intricacies of achieving controlled impedance in these designs, examining the factors that influence it, the different configurations available, and their impact on PCB thickness and flexibility.
Controlled impedance is crucial for high-speed signal integrity. In flex and rigid-flex designs, achieving this typically requires a thicker core than standard, influenced by the dielectric constant of the materials and the required spacing between the signal layer and the reference plane. While a standard core might be 1 mil in thickness, controlled impedance often necessitates a minimum of 2 to 4 mils. This adjustment is vital for achieving the required controlled impedance but comes with a drawback in the increased overall thickness.
For higher-end controlled impedances, such as 120-ohm differentials and 60-ohm single signals, even thicker cores are necessary. This is a direct consequence of needing to maintain specific impedance values while accommodating the physical constraints of the PCB materials and design. So, why are thicker cores needed for advanced impedance?
The impedance of a PCB trace is influenced by its width, the dielectric material’s properties, and the distance to the reference plane. Higher impedance specifications often necessitate thinner trace widths and or increased spacing between the trace and reference plane layers. This, in turn, requires thicker cores to accommodate these adjustments while preserving signal integrity.
As signal speeds increase, the risk of crosstalk and signal attenuation also rises. Thicker cores provide more room to separate traces, reducing the likelihood of interference between high-speed signals. This separation is crucial in maintaining the clarity and integrity of each signal, especially in densely packed PCB layouts.
The choice of dielectric material plays a pivotal role in controlling impedance. Materials with a lower dielectric constant can allow for thinner cores. Selecting the right material is a balancing act between achieving the desired impedance and meeting the mechanical bend requirements of the application.
For stack-up optimization, designers must carefully plan the PCB stack-up to achieve the required impedance levels. This involves selecting the appropriate number of layers, determining their arrangement, and choosing the right core and prepreg materials. Simulation tools are often used to model different stack-up configurations and assess their impact on impedance.
For trace geometry and routing techniques, advanced impedance requirements may necessitate specific trace geometries, such as thinner trace widths or differential pairs with precise spacing. Routing techniques also play a role, as the path and length of the traces can affect impedance. Designers must consider these factors in the context of the available space and the overall complexity of the PCB.
When it comes to prototyping, given the complexity and precision required for high-end impedance control, prototyping, and iterative testing are often necessary. This allows designers to validate their design choices, assess performance under real-world conditions, and adjust as needed before final production.
This configuration consists of two layers: one for signals and another acting as a solid ground reference plane. It’s a standard approach for common impedance requirements like 100-ohm differential and 50-ohm single-ended signals.
A more complex setup, the stripline configuration sandwiches the signal layer between two reference planes. This offers full shielding of signal traces, crucial for meeting EMI and RF requirements. However, it increases the PCB thickness by about 60-67%, mainly due to the addition of the second reference plane and slightly thicker cores.
Stack-up example of a 100-ohm surface micro-strip differential pair.
For shielding options, let’s look at EMI shielding films. These are preferred when impedance control isn’t a priority, but when signal ‘noise’ is a concern. These films are laminated to the external surface, providing effective shielding without significantly increasing thickness. As an alternative, copper shield layers will be necessary when controlled impedance is a requirement. This option increases PCB thickness by about 50% but is essential for those impedance-controlled designs. A third option of silver ink shield layers is an older technology, and it is not recommended for controlled impedance applications.
In some PCB designs, addressing current carrying requirements when combined with controlled impedance is an aspect that significantly impacts the overall configuration of the board. When the design needs to accommodate higher current levels, the use of thicker copper becomes essential. This is particularly evident in designs where space is limited, and the option to use wider traces for increased current capacity is not feasible. As a result, the copper layers need to be thickened to handle the increased current without compromising the board’s integrity or performance.
The incorporation of thicker copper layers will also directly influence the requirements for the adhesive layers used in multilayer PCBs. These adhesive layers play a crucial role in ensuring that the copper traces are securely bonded to the board and properly insulated. To achieve effective encapsulation and adhere to industry standards such as those set by the IPC (Institute for Printed Circuits), the thickness of the adhesive layer needs to be proportionate to the copper layer’s thickness. Typically, the guideline is to use 1 mil of adhesive for every ounce of copper thickness. This ratio is critical to maintain structural integrity and avoid issues like delamination or electrical shorts, which can arise from inadequate bonding.
As the complexity of a PCB design escalates, often driven by the need to incorporate more functionality into increasingly compact spaces, the solution frequently lies in adding more layers to the board. This escalation in layer count is a direct response to the challenge of accommodating a higher density of circuits and components within a confined area. Each additional layer, while providing more real estate for circuitry, also contributes to an overall increase in the thickness of the flex circuit. For instance, moving from a two-layer to a three-layer construction can lead to a substantial increase in thickness, sometimes by as much as 40%.
This increase in thickness, while necessary for meeting design complexity, can have implications on the flexibility of the circuit and its suitability for certain applications. Designers must carefully balance the need for additional layers with the inherent flexibility characteristics required for the end application. In some cases, advanced materials and innovative layering techniques may be employed to mitigate the impact on thickness, allowing for complex designs to maintain a degree of flexibility suitable for dynamic or space-constrained environments.
Controlled impedance in flex and rigid-flex PCB designs is a balancing act between maintaining signal integrity and managing physical constraints such as thickness and flexibility. The choice of configuration, materials, and layer count all play crucial roles in achieving the desired electrical performance while adhering to space and flexibility requirements. Understanding these aspects is key to successful PCB design in high-speed applications.
QFPCB has 15 years of experience in the field of Flexible PCB production, choose QFPCB, you will get a reliable supplier in China. Contact us today for your Flexible PCB solutions.
Flex and rigid-flex circuit boards are a combination of both electrical and mechanical requirements that allow for solutions to many tight packaging requirements. However, this combination is also the potential source of design challenges as some electrical requirements can have a negative impact on the mechanical bend capabilities of flex circuits. If not, correctly addressed the reliability of the finished design may be compromised.
In this blog, we’ll discuss the three most common electrical requirements that have a negative impact on the mechanical capabilities of a flex or rigid-flex circuit board and the potential solutions that can be applied to achieve a successful design.
Controlled impedance designs, and their inherent requirement of thicker cores to achieve the required impedance values increase the flex thickness and negatively impacts both the flexibility and bend capabilities. The goal is to minimize the flex thickness as much as possible to allow for the greatest degree of bend capability and reliability.
In combination with the improved dielectric constant of polyimide, thinner copper weights and thinner trace widths/spacing than typically used in rigid PCB designs allow for a higher degree of flexibility and bend capability.
A common preferred configuration utilizes a 2-3 mil flex core, 0.5 oz copper and an approx. 0.004” line width. With minor adjustments, this will allow for the common 50-ohm single-ended and 90- to 120-ohm differential pair requirements.
An additional element is the configuration of the controlled impedance. The two most common being surface micro strip and stripline.
The surface micro strip allows for a thinner flexible PCB design (2 layers with a thinner core), while a stripline significantly increases the flex thickness (3 layers with 2 thicker cores). A stripline configuration is approximately 75% thicker than a surface microstrip. See images below.
Shielding requirements will also need to be evaluated to determine which configuration is needed.
To summarize, thinner controlled impedance line widths allow for thinner copper, thinner cores, and, in turn, improved flexibility and mechanical bend reliability.
Flexible PCB surface micro strip controlled impedance stack-up
3 Layers flexible PCB stripline controlled impedance stack-up
Higher current carrying requirements pose a challenge due to the thicker copper needed. Increasing the copper thickness, however, has the greatest negative impact on flexibility and bend capability.
The preferred methodology is to utilize wider traces combined with thinner copper to achieve the current carrying capacity. This may require one or more of the following techniques:
A careful review of the bend requirements is a necessary part of the design process to ensure the mechanical reliability of the finished parts. The bend capabilities of a flex circuit are determined by the design, construction, and materials only. The manufacturing process does not have an impact on flexibility.
5 Layers Rigid-flex PCB stack-up for higher current carrying requirements
Designs with many interconnects, traversing the flex section(s), can lead to a higher layer count requirement which, in turn, constrains the bend capabilities. The goal is to either minimize the layer count and/or use a construction method that improves the flexibility.
Reducing the layer count by using a combination of the above is the optimum solution if the design allows. A 0.004” line and space with 0.5 oz copper may result in eliminating a flex layer, which will have the biggest positive impact on flexibility and bend capability/reliability.
If the flex layer count cannot be reduced, a rigid-flex design can use an air-gap construction where the flex layers are configured as independent sets or pairs from one another. This reduces the “I-Beam” effect and allows the flex layer pairs to bend independently from one another, which significantly improves the flexibility of the design.
This method can be applied to designs with 3 or more layers, impedance control, and or higher current carrying requirements. The copper weight and flex core thickness can vary between flex layer pairs as necessary.
We recommend a design review and bend capability input from your supplier to determine the optimum construction for high density designs.
8-layer rigid-flex PCB with a 6-layer flex stack-up for a high density / interconnect design.
A successful design meets both the electrical and, equally important, the mechanical requirements. The electrical provides the functionality and performance while the mechanical addresses the packaging requirements but also has the greatest impact on the reliability. As discussed above, controlled impedance, higher current, and high circuit density can have a negative impact on the mechanical capabilities and the reliability. There are many options available in materials and construction that will resolve this challenge and result in a successful and reliable design.
Name: Industrial audio equipment flexible PCB
Material: FASB0520
Layers: 2L
Thickness: 0.12mm
Surface Finish: Gold fingers
Min Trace/Width: 2.5/2.5mil
Application: Industrial audio equipment
Name: Smart Wear Rigid-flex Circuit Board
Material: IT-180A+PI
Layers: 12L
Thickness: 1.0mm
Surface Finish: ENEPIG
Min Trace/Width: 3/3mil
Application: Smart Wear
Products & Services
PCB Technology
Contacts
Technical Support & Quote
Get A Quote